Category Archives: ECHR

R v Oakes the Granddaddy of ‘Proportionality’ Human Rights Blogs #50Cases My Notes on How the Oakes Test was built up

Posted on Mar 27, 2015 by katesjc6189

The Defendant skillfully put a Case for his rights to be examined with regard to Reverse Onus of Proof Lawyerly? I have noticed a lot of Defendants are unable to make their Case well based on the ECHR. This one … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 6 Right to a Fair Trial, barrister, barristers, Burden of Proof Doctrine, Canadian Charter of Human Rights, Case Reading Journal, Crime, criminal defence lawyers, ECHR, Evidence, Evidence the Law of Evidence and Police Investigation and gathering of Evidence, Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, Human Rights ECHR et al, Informal Legal Education, Judgments, Juristictions, Justice, Law Apps, Law School, Law Student, Law Students, Law Students Law School, Learning to read like a Lawyer in order to become a Lawyer, LEGISLATION, NON LAWYERS, QC'S, reading, Reverse onus of Proof Provisions, Save UK Justice Campaign, Self Learning, The Rule of Law Eqaulity of Access to the Courts | Tagged Adam Wagner Human Rights Barrister, Criminal Defence Lawyers, Human Rights, QC's, R v Oakes 1986 Canada, The Human Rights Blog, The Oakes Test | Leave a comment

More on those Greedy Corporations acting Ultra Vires Part II I believe because of a legal loophole in ECHR ‘public bodies’ not Corporations

Posted on Mar 13, 2015 by katesjc6189

Amazon flogging of Kindle Editions of books. Kindle books mean Amazon can gather Big Reading Habits Data which is NEVER stated at the point of sale. Amazon uses Boilerplate Contracts to bind users to conditions like Internet Advertising, Data gathering … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 10 Freedom of Expression, Article 19 Freedom of Speech Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Big Data, corporate intrusion into our private lives, Data mining, ECHR, Human Rights ECHR et al, Informal Legal Education, Law School, Law Student, Law Students, privacy datamining, reading | Tagged Amazon, Apple, Big Data, datamining privacy, European Court of Human Rights ECHR, internet giants facebook google amazon goodreads, Kindle and E Reading Datamining, Tune In | Leave a comment

Eight Reasons why Human Rights makes Britain a better place original Campaign by John Cooper QC

Posted on Oct 11, 2014 by katesjc6189

http://www.amnesty.org.uk/eight-reasons-why-human-rights-act-has-made-uk-better-place-british-bill-of-rights?utm_source=FBPAGE&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=International_Justice_&utm_content=20141003181833&linkId=9871106 The ECHR supported John Beckett, Jeanette Smith and Duncan Lustig-Prean, sacked from the Armed Forces for their sexuality © Press Association In December 2013 Chris Grayling said he believed that the European Court of Human Rights did not … Continue reading →

Posted in barrister, barristers, criminal defence lawyers, Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, Duties at Police Stations, Duty Lawyering, ECHR, European Court of Human Rights, General Legal Learning, Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, Human Rights ECHR et al, Informal Legal Education, International Law, John Cooper QC, LEGISLATION, NON LAWYERS, Public Law, QC'S, QC's Queens Counsel, Rule of Law, Save UK Justice Campaign, Self Learning, Slater and Gordon, Stigmatization of despised Minorities | Tagged Amnesty International UK, barristers, Domestic Abuse, Domestic Violence, Due Process, European Court of Human Rights ECHR, Human Rights, Human Rights Act, Human Rights Bar, Human Rights Firms and arms, Human Rights Solicitors, John Cooper QC, LGBT, Marriage, Married Couples, of Law, Residential Homes, Save UK Justice Campaign, The Rule of Law | Leave a comment

The Verdict on Beyond Reasonable Doubt reblogged from The Barrister Magazine Current Issue

Posted on Sep 25, 2014 by katesjc6189

What is the Criminal Standard of Proof? Standard of proof In all legal proceedings it is necessary for the party bringing the action to establish the facts upon which the case is reliant. This is the burden of proof. … Continue reading →

Posted in Article 6 Right to a Fair Trial, Complex Difficult Fraud Trials, criminal defence lawyers, Devils Advocacy, ECHR, Evidence the Law of Evidence and Police Investigation and gathering of Evidence, General Legal Learning, Juries, Juries and Jury Trials, Justice, NON LAWYERS, QC'S, QC's Queens Counsel, Rule of Law, Save UK Justice Campaign, Self Learning, The Criminal Bar Association, The Criminal Bar Association Monday Message, The Criminal Standard of Proof: Beyond Reasonable Doubt or BRD, Trial by Jury | Tagged #saveukjustice, Article 6 Right to a Fair Trial, barristers, Beyond Reasonable Doubt BRD Criminal Standard of Proof Doctrine, Complex and Difficult Fraud Trial Advocacy, Complex Fraud Trials, Criminal Advocacy, Criminal Defence Lawyers, Criminal justice, Evidence and Evidence Gathering by Police, Human Rights, John Cooper QC, Juries, Jury Trials, Jury Trials in Jeopardy, Law, Lawyers, The Criminal Standard of Proof, The Marrache Fraud Case Gibralter, The Right to a Trial by Jury | Leave a comment

The Monstering of Human Rights from UK The Human Rights Blog Adam Wagner

Posted on Sep 23, 2014 by katesjc6189

SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 BY ADAM WAGNER The Monstering of Human Rights On Friday 19 September I spoke at a very interesting conference at the University of Liverpool on Human Rights in the UK Media: Representation and Reality. My talk was entitled The … Continue reading →

Posted in chomsky, criminal defence lawyers, ECHR, Human Rights, Media, Media Manufacturing Consent The Evidence | Tagged #saveukjustice, Advocacy, barristers, Crime, Criminal Advocacy, Criminal Defence Lawyers, Human Rights, Media | Leave a comment

Draft Sentencing Guidelines for Theft Consultation from ‘Criminal Law and Justice Weekly’ Vol 178 April 5 2014

Posted on Jul 6, 2014 by katesjc6189

http://www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk/news/New-Draft-Guidelines-Sentencing-Thieves wide variety of types of theft such as pick-pocketing, shop theft, handling stolen goods, car theft, leaving a restaurant or petrol station without paying and stealing by employees or care workers. It also includes abstraction of electricity – that … Continue reading →

Posted in ADVOCACY, Crimeline Complete, criminal defence lawyers, Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, Criminal Practioners in Magistrates Courts, Crown Courts, Devils Advocacy, Duty Lawyering, ECHR, FIGHTFORLEGALAID, Government Consultations, John Cooper QC, JP, Judgments, LASPO2012andworst, Legal Aid UK, Magistrates Court, Magistrates Courts, NON LAWYERS, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, QC'S, Save UK Justice Campaign, Sentencing, The CBA UK, The Criminal Bar Association, Theft Offence, Theft Offences | Tagged barristers, Crime, Criminal Legal Aid, Crown Court, Government Consultation, JP, Law, Legal aid, Magistrates Courts, Offences, Pupil Barristers, Save UK Justice Campaign, Sentencing Decisions, Sentencing Guidelines, Theft | 2 Comments

Police Bail Jon Robins on the need for Statutory Time Limits

Posted on Jul 3, 2014 by katesjc6189

The Introduction of the Law Society’s Recommendations of 28 Days in Police Bail means there would be the correct LEGAL PROCEDURES in place to help Defendants held to get Justice where the Evidence gathered would be gathered in a … Continue reading →

Posted in criminal defence lawyers, Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, Criminal Practioners in Magistrates Courts, Crown Court, Devils Advocacy, Duty Lawyering, ECHR, Evidence, Evidence: Police gathering, FIGHTFORLEGALAID, General Legal Learning, John Cooper QC, Magistrates Court, NON LAWYERS, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Public Perception of Legal Profession, QC'S, Save UK Justice Campaign | Leave a comment

The Marrache Fraud Trials Verdicts: The Marrache Brothers are found guilty with Leanne Turner found not guilty I don’t think this Trial has been fair

Posted on Jul 2, 2014 by katesjc6189

EVIDENCE & KEY QUESTIONS In January, Sir Geoffrey refused applications of ‘no case to answer’, made onbehalf of Isaac & Benjamin Marrache, and Leanne Turnbull. That effectivelymeant the Judge believed evidence had been presented by the Crown which, if accepted, … Continue reading →

Posted in A Layman looks at Cases, ADVOCACY, Complex Difficult Fraud Trials, criminal defence lawyers, ECHR, FIGHTFORLEGALAID, Fraud Law, GBC Newsroom Gibralter, Gibralter, International Law, John Cooper QC, Judgments, Legal Aid UK, NON LAWYERS, QC'S, QC's Queens Counsel, Save UK Justice Campaign, SAVINGTHEINDEPENDENTBARFORTHEPUBLICGOOD, The Criminal Bar Association, The Law Society UK, The Marrache VHCC Fraud Case, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights | Tagged #saveukjustice, Advocacy, barristers, failinggrayling, Human Rights, John Cooper QC, Law, Law school, Legal aid, Non Lawyer, Non Lawyers, QC's, Rule of law, the Public Interest, Twitter, Youtube | 3 Comments

Iran Tribunal a final and reasoned Judgement via John Cooper QC a Commentary

Posted on Feb 25, 2014 by katesjc6189

NOTES IN AT THE DEEP END ONCE AGAIN AND MAYBE AGAIN LAWYER1972 and John Cooper QC???!!!! with gratitude if yes. http://www.irantribunal.com/index.php/en/ Iran Tribunal is an International People’s Tribunal created by a large group of individuals composed of families of political prisoners executed … Continue reading →

Posted in A Layman looks at Cases, ADVOCACY, ADVOCACY LAWYERS AND NON LAWYERS, Crimes against Humanity, criminal defence lawyers, Devils Advocacy, ECHR, FIGHTFORLEGALAID, General Legal Learning, International Law, International Peoples Tribunal as an an exposer of atrocities, John Cooper QC, Judgments, Legal Pioneers, NON LAWYERS, Public Law, Public Perception of Legal Profession, QC'S, QC's Queens Counsel, Save Probation UK Campaign, Save UK Justice Campaign, The Criminal Bar Association, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights | Tagged #saveukjustice, Advocacy, barristers, Criminal Advocacy, Criminal justice, Human Rights, John Cooper QC, Non Lawyer, Twitter | Leave a comment

Category Archives: ECHR

Archives

Meta